![]() Home pull-up bars come in three forms: doorway, mounted, and standalone. Most Versatile: Relife Power Tower Workout Dip Station.Best Portable: ProsourceFit Multi-Use Doorway Pull-Up Bar.Best Chin-Up Bar: Tycrali Pull-Up Bar for Doorway.Best Ceiling-Mounted: Ultimate Body Press Pull-Up Bar.Best Wall-Mounted: OneTwoFit Wall-Mounted Pull-Up Bar.Best Standing: Sportsroyals Power Tower Dip Station Pull-Up Bar.Best Overall Pull-Up Bar for Home: Iron Gym Total Upper Body Workout Bar.These are the best pull-up bars to buy right now, according to customer reviews: (They also happen to be key piece of equipment in Carrie Underwood upper body workout.) Plus, the underrated tool is compact enough for small apartments, shared spaces, or spare rooms. Pull up bars allow you to do a combination of eccentric and concentric movements and isometric training. They're not only great for exercises that strengthen the chest, back, and arms - including pull-ups or chin-ups and dead hangs - but also for core-focused movements, i.e. I plan to update it to a newer version soon and that update should bring in a bunch of new word senses for many words (or more accurately, lemma).Many people consider dumbbells, exercise mats, and cardio machines to be non-negotiable when it comes to building the perfect home gym, but pull-up bars are low-key one of the most cost-effective and versatile pieces of home equipment you can add to your space. ![]() Special thanks to the contributors of the open-source code that was used in this project: the UBY project (mentioned above), and express.js.Ĭurrently, this is based on a version of wiktionary which is a few years old. I simply extracted the Wiktionary entries and threw them into this interface! So it took a little more work than expected, but I'm happy I kept at it after the first couple of blunders. The researchers have parsed the whole of Wiktionary and other sources, and compiled everything into a single unified resource. That's when I stumbled across the UBY project - an amazing project which needs more recognition. However, after a day's work wrangling it into a database I realised that there were far too many errors (especially with the part-of-speech tagging) for it to be viable for Word Type.įinally, I went back to Wiktionary - which I already knew about, but had been avoiding because it's not properly structured for parsing. This caused me to investigate the 1913 edition of Websters Dictionary - which is now in the public domain. I initially started with WordNet, but then realised that it was missing many types of words/lemma (determiners, pronouns, abbreviations, and many more). The dictionary is based on the amazing Wiktionary project by wikimedia. And since I already had a lot of the infrastructure in place from the other two sites, I figured it wouldn't be too much more work to get this up and running. I had an idea for a website that simply explains the word types of the words that you search for - just like a dictionary, but focussed on the part of speech of the words. Both of those projects are based around words, but have much grander goals. For those interested in a little info about this site: it's a side project that I developed while working on Describing Words and Related Words.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |